reddysteadygo

Permalink I’m just very detonate-able?
Permalink
Permalink

Gunnerkrigg Court

This weekend I re-read all of one of my favorite webcomics called Friendly Hostility. Apparently Estelle and Anna were also big fans back in the day, and I had such a great time bonding with Estelle over it that I decided to return the favor and next read one of her favorites.

She recommends Tom Siddell’s Gunnerkrigg Court. She says it starts off a little slow but that I will indubitably fall madly in love with it. Want to read along? Recommend others?

Permalink ilovecharts:

What’s In A Name?

Reason #939 why iPhones are better.
Permalink
Permalink Ladies and Gentleman, may I present Eric and his ten word passwords.
ilovecharts:

Password
-adamfergler
Permalink

Translating SXSW Tweets

theatlantic:

If you’re just newly aware of SXSW and are now reading Twitter and thinking that everyone’s having a great, interesting time, well, you should know: Everyone’s speaking in code. They’re saying one thing but they really mean another. Let’s break it down.

They Say: ”Psyched for the [Vague Internet Topic] panel featuring @FriendOrCoworker’sName.”
They Mean: ”Going to go watch people I know from my hometown talk to other people I know from my hometown about some vague kind of thing so we can all say we did something down here.”

They Say: ”Worst part of #SXSW? Standing out in the sun/rain.”
They Mean: ”I just waited in a line for three hours so I could tweet about the weather.”

They Say: ”Ugh, crowd at the @SomeCoolInternetProperty party is crazy/random. Thank god for beer.”
They Mean: ”While I don’t really want you to know that I’m standing alone at this party getting drunk and fiddling on my phone, I really want you to know that I’m at this party at all, so I’m tweeting.”

They Say: ”[Brief, wacky anecdote]” followed by “Only at #SXSW” or something similar.
They Mean: ”This is my first time here but I want it to seem like I’m an old pro.”

The Say: ”[Quote from @RespectedPerson’s keynote speech]”
They Mean: ”I want you to think I’m smart and interested in things but really I’m so bored that I’m tweeting rather than listening.”

Read more.

bahahaha. Overly sarcastic but lightened by the fact that it’s the truth and that it’s twitter.

Permalink
Permalink scribnerbooks:

what do you think of Pinterest? Do you use it? Love it? Hate it? Don’t get it?
shortformblog:

Out come the haters: The Pinterest backlash intensifies
Some people can only handle so much Ryan Gosling. The sudden rise of Pinterest, which surged in popularity around the first of the year (as this chart illustrates perfectly), seems to have caught some off guard, with many questioning the phenomenon much the same way Twitter initially got criticized for being about nothing. But with the site already the subject of copyright questions (in one case making a lawyer and Pinterest fan totally freak out), it was only a matter of time before the deep-thought hand-wringing began. A couple of notable samples we’ve seen recently:
one MacLean’s writer Lisan Jutras criticizes it for being strongly feminine, but only on the surface: “This domain is sort of like a girls-only clubhouse, but it’s not about expressing innermost desires, just surface desires—for hair, shoes, nail art, a boyfriend that exists in soft-focus black-and-white.”
two Thought Catalog narrows down the appeal of the service in a single damning line: “It’s the first Nora Ephron movie that you have to log into, and yep, you guessed it, there’s a wait list to join.” Their problem is stated plainly in the headline: “Pinterest: The depths we will go to not read.”
» A couple quick thoughts of our own: It’s possible that the success of Pinterest may reach a little bit of a plateau at some point because of the shape it’s already taken. It’s growing quickly, but the best social networks are formless in terms of the content. Anything goes on Tumblr for the most part, for example; same with Twitter and Facebook. With Pinterest, the culture has kind of limited what can work there, at least for now. It feels like, even if it hasn’t been spelled out, the parameters have been partially defined. And for businesses, minus a few obvious verticals (say, you sell clothes or artwork) Pinterest is not necessary or even desirable for building a strong brand. It could be, though, if it was repositioned slightly. These are some of the things the site will struggle with as it tries to grow. if we were them, we’d figure out ways to encourage shapelessness, so as not to scare new users off.
Follow ShortFormBlog



I mean I know Thought Catalog is over but I think the title “The Depths We Will Go Not to Read” is perfectly what Pinterest is about.
Permalink ohjeffreyno:

Funny story, my mom used this site. Never worked.

For readers of Horse E-Books!
Permalink fantagraphics:

newyorker:

Cartoon of the day. Don’t forget to enter this week’s caption contest: http://nyr.kr/r46had

And don’t forget to read Emily Flake’s Cartoonist’s Diary which ran all this week at The Comics Journal.

My worst nightmare! That’s why I don’t have any charity apps.
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink
Permalink rachelfershleiser:

(via Milwaukee Public Library’s Brilliant Ad Campaign)

Wait, I really don’t like this campaign. Time spent on social media websites is not necessarily a waste. In fact a lot of people make or enhance their living through these websites. I mean nobody is a bigger advocate for literature and reading than I am, but that being said reading a book in itself isn’t any better than connecting with your friends or watching a video on youtube.
It’s about what you do with what you have, why do we always resort to demonizing or shaming people into reading instead of educating them about the resources that are available to them for how to better their lives?